From: Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:02:48 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: RMS о snap и flatpack
X-Git-Url: http://www.git.stargrave.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=682da25803aac6937431d5a3cc7227d7fab5e6b8;p=stargrave-blog.git

RMS о snap и flatpack

https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews_discusses_DRM_and_DMCA_with_Richard_Stallman_after_GitHub_re-enables_public_access_to_youtube-dl

    That's a bad thing. It's a foolish thing. It's hard to trust these
    snaps and flatpaks. [...]
    I've never installed a snap or a flatpak. And I don't think I want
    to. I wouldn't. I don't trust it. How do I know whether that flatpak
    includes some non-free software. How could I check? I don't think
    they're designed to let people check. They're not designed for
    anyone to be able to build the program. As far as I know, I could be
    mistaken but if all everybody does is just install the binaries, in
    the flatpak. Nobody's building it, how does anybody know if the
    complete source is available.

Для меня тоже вообще не требовалось никаких размышлений или объяснений
касательно этого метода распространения софта: очевидная не совместимая
с движением свободного ПО туфта.
---