From 666f26e530182cfaf3550184d56cd076b81ed4a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sergey Matveev <stargrave@stargrave.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 11:17:27 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] NAT mess vs clean IPv6 routing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

https://blog.apnic.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/image.jpg
https://blog.apnic.net/2025/05/13/lets-talk-about-cgnat-and-ipv6-again/
https://www.f5.com/resources/white-papers/the-myth-of-network-address-translation-as-security
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-690/
https://blog.apnic.net/2023/04/04/ipv6-architecture-and-subnetting-guide-for-network-engineers-and-operators/
Понравилась картинка. Route when you can, bridge when you must, but if
you are thinking NAT... just route IPv6 and walk away with dignity.
-- 
2.51.0