From 682da25803aac6937431d5a3cc7227d7fab5e6b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Matveev Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:02:48 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?RMS=20=D0=BE=20snap=20=D0=B8=20flatpack?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews_discusses_DRM_and_DMCA_with_Richard_Stallman_after_GitHub_re-enables_public_access_to_youtube-dl That's a bad thing. It's a foolish thing. It's hard to trust these snaps and flatpaks. [...] I've never installed a snap or a flatpak. And I don't think I want to. I wouldn't. I don't trust it. How do I know whether that flatpak includes some non-free software. How could I check? I don't think they're designed to let people check. They're not designed for anyone to be able to build the program. As far as I know, I could be mistaken but if all everybody does is just install the binaries, in the flatpak. Nobody's building it, how does anybody know if the complete source is available. Для меня тоже вообще не требовалось никаких размышлений или объяснений касательно этого метода распространения софта: очевидная не совместимая с движением свободного ПО туфта. -- 2.50.0