From ea11f066a3e22752c556e36b4ae96a1073ec5f29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sergey Matveev Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:17:15 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?=D0=91=D0=BB=D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=87=D0=B5=D0=B9=D0=BD?= =?utf8?q?=D1=8B=20=D0=B8=20=D0=B4=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B8=D0=B5?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2019/02/blockchain_and_.html Отличная статья Брюса Шнайера о доверии к blockchain-ам, их реальной пользе. Всё крутится вокруг доверия -- в данном случае вокруг доверия к исходному коду. Do you need a public blockchain? The answer is almost certainly no. A blockchain probably doesn't solve the security problems you think it solves. The security problems it solves are probably not the ones you have. (Manipulating audit data is probably not your major security risk.) A false trust in blockchain can itself be a security risk. The inefficiencies, especially in scaling, are probably not worth it. I have looked at many blockchain applications, and all of them could achieve the same security properties without using a blockchain­ -- of course, then they wouldn't have the cool name. Honestly, cryptocurrencies are useless. They're only used by speculators looking for quick riches, people who don't like government-backed currencies, and criminals who want a black-market way to exchange money. -- 2.48.1