terminals.
@item Support for threading?
-Currently I am not sure, but I am sure that if anybody is going to
-discuss something threadable, then he is plainly wrong about the
-platform he is using now. Email is much more convenient in all that kind
-of stuff. IM is for chatting, for real-time short-living chatters. Email
-is for discussion and for something that can be valuable in the future.
-Let's stop competing for the most unusable yet another bicycle and use
-piles of already written mature software, that includes dozens of years
-of professional user experience.
+Currently I am not sure, but definitely if anybody is going to discuss
+something threadable, then he is plainly wrong about the platform. Email
+is much more convenient in all that kind of stuff. IM is for real-time
+short-living chatters. Email is for discussion and for something that
+can be valuable in the future. Let's stop competing for the most
+unusable yet another bicycle and use piles of already written mature
+software, that includes dozens of years of professional user experience.
@item Support for channel creation/deletion/invitations?
For years I have never met any reason to create own separate channel on
@item Support for polls?
-What next bizarre things people will put into IMs? Only Interactive
-Fiction games (inside IM) could change my mind. Just kidding.
+What next bizarre thing people will put into IMs? Only Interactive
+Fiction games inside IM could change my mind. Just kidding of course.
-@item Dynamic updating of appeared users/channels?
-Restart the client. That is so seldom and rare, that spent time is not
-worth of it.
+@item Dynamic updating of appearing users/channels?
+Restart the client. That is so rare, that spent time is not worth of it.
@end table