TODO: add item for optional Cache::FastMmap

[public-inbox.git] / TODO

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index d947b0ff822198abccc4f1c558eedd42f64bbae5..7bd68c7b816bd5e13a44119fe70d068663be3c74 100644 (file)
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -23,6 +23,16 @@ all need to be considered for everything we introduce)
 
 * TLS support for various daemons (including STARTTLS for NNTP and POP3)
 
+* optional Cache::FastMmap support so production deployments won't
+  need Varnish (Varnish doesn't protect NNTP, either)
+
+* dogfood and take advantage of new kernel APIs (while maintaining
+  portability to older Linux, free BSDs and maybe Hurd).
+
+* dogfood latest Xapian, Perl5, SQLite, git and various modules to
+  ensure things continue working as they should (or more better)
+  while retaining compatibility with old versions.
+
 * NNTP COMPRESS extension (see innd)
 
 * Support more of RFC 3977 (NNTP)
@@ -35,6 +45,8 @@ all need to be considered for everything we introduce)
   likewise "[Bug #123456]" could be configured to expand to
   point to some project's bug tracker at http://example.com/bug/123456
 
+* configurable synonym and spelling support in Xapian
+
 * Support optional "HTTPS Everywhere" for mapping old HTTP to HTTPS
   links if (and only if) the user wants to use HTTPS.  We may also
   be able to configure redirects for expired URLs.
@@ -69,8 +81,6 @@ all need to be considered for everything we introduce)
 
 * large mbox/Maildir/MH/NNTP spool import (see PublicInbox::Import)
 
-* Allow NNTP and more of PSGI code to work without Xapian
-
 * Read-only WebDAV interface to the git repo so it can be mounted
   via davfs2 or fusedav to avoid full clones.
   davfs2 needs Range: request support for this to be feasible:
@@ -81,6 +91,9 @@ all need to be considered for everything we introduce)
   Inboxes (and any git repos) can be kept up-to-date without
   relying on polling.
 
+* Improve bundle support in git to make it cheaper to host/clone
+  with dumb HTTP(S) servers.
+
 * Expose targeted reindexing of individual messages.
   Sometimes an indexing bug only affects a handful of messages,
   so it's not worth the trouble of doing a full reindex.