connection.go |  8 ++++++++
 torrent.go    | 10 ++++++++++

diff --git a/connection.go b/connection.go
index 3ba41076fbe3ba895adc0a754e08dd6b84c04a4b..94451c6de6d6939dda04e1f72aef6f30d116cb01 100644
--- a/connection.go
+++ b/connection.go
@@ -1060,3 +1060,11 @@ 		return
 	}
 	c.Choke()
 }
+
+func (cn *connection) Drop() {
+	cn.t.dropConnection(cn)
+}
+
+func (cn *connection) sentHave(piece int) bool {
+	return piece < len(cn.sentHaves) && cn.sentHaves[piece]
+}
diff --git a/torrent.go b/torrent.go
index f6f723bf42b74a5eb553f442ec4161a77830ff49..89422917de494b24ecb03724c0b2c5214881db94 100644
--- a/torrent.go
+++ b/torrent.go
@@ -1469,6 +1469,16 @@ 	}
 	if !t.wantPieceIndex(piece) {
 		return
 	}
+	// We could drop any connections that we told we have a piece that we
+	// don't here. But there's a test failure, and it seems clients don't care
+	// if you request pieces that you already claim to have. Pruning bad
+	// connections might just remove any connections that aren't treating us
+	// favourably anyway.
+	// for c := range t.conns {
+	// 	if c.sentHave(piece) {
+	// 		c.Drop()
+	// 	}
+	// }
 	for conn := range t.conns {
 		if conn.PeerHasPiece(piece) {
 			conn.updateRequests()